Spring 2008 Newsletter

Welcome to our Spring 2008 Newsletter. We hope you find the articles featured useful and informative. If you need further information on any of the topics covered please contact our office.
ATO COMPLIANCE PROGRAM: 2008/09
The Tax Commissioner, Michael
D’Ascenzo, has realised the ATO’s Compliance program for 2008/09, which lets
the community know where they will focus their attention and the action they
will take in the coming year, “so people know which areas of risk they should
avoid”.
The ATO will focus on (among
other things):
Their priorities for individual
taxpayers include:
More
industry benchmarks, data matching, and cash economy audits
The Commissioner also advised
that the ATO will:

EDUCATION
TAX OFFSET
NOW
AVAILABLE
Parents are being advised to
‘keep their receipts’ for education expenses in light of the commencement of
the Education Tax Offset from 1 July 2008.
How much
can be claimed?
Eligible families (generally
parents entitled to Family Tax Benefit (FTB) Part A) will be able to claim a
50% tax offset every year (in their tax return) for key education expenses up
to:
What
items are covered?
Eligible expenses include:
FBT
& MINOR BENEFITS EXEMPTION
Editor: The provision of a ‘minor benefit’ (which must be less than
$300) to an employee or their associate can be exempt from fringe benefits tax
(FBT) if it meets the relevant criteria.
One of those
criteria requires a consideration
of the infrequency and irregularity
of the provision of associated,
identical or similar benefits.
The ATO recently confirmed that
the provision of a Christmas party to employees and their associates every year
would still be considered ‘infrequent and irregular’, and may, therefore, be
exempt from FBT.
It has now confirmed that the
same rationale can apply to the provision of other benefits.
That is, the fact that a benefit
is provided only once each year, but in more than one year, does not mean that
the benefit cannot be considered as a minor benefit.
For example, an employer may not
need to pay any FBT when it provides each of its employees with a reimbursement
of $295 p.a. towards a local gym membership.
However, this would not be the
case if the gym membership was included in an employee’s salary package under a
salary sacrifice arrangement.

BUSINESS
SUCCESSION PLANNING
A popular saying in management
circles is that if you fail to plan, you plan to fail. However, it seems that
many family-run businesses are struggling to embrace this concept.
A recent survey of small businesses
found an “alarming” 83 per cent did not know how they were going to appoint
their next Chief Executive. This was despite the survey finding 34 per cent of
Chief Executives were planning to step down within the next 5 years.
Reasons given in the survey for
the lack of planning in this area included:
ü no likely successor
had been identified;
ü it was too early to
plan for a successor;
ü it was too difficult
to plan for a successor.
A business succession plan is not
something that can be completed overnight and in many instances may take years.
It is important that the issue is identified and addressed as early as possible
so that the business and owners have a clear plan going forward.
If you would like assistance in
formulating your business succession plan please contact our office.

SELF
MANAGED SUPER FUNDS (SMSFS):
INVESTMENT
RULES
The ATO has recently released two
rulings, which consider some of the important investment rules that set out how
the ATO expects SMSF trustees will use superannuation money.
Editor: Because the
superannuation laws allow for very concessional tax treatment of money invested
in a superannuation environment, there are very strict rules about what trustees
can and can’t do.
Two of these investment rules
are:
v The ‘sole purpose test’ (i.e., basically,
the SMSF must be run solely to provide benefits on members retirement or
death); and
v The prohibition on
SMSFs using fund resources to provide financial
assistance to a member, or a relative of a member.
The rulings provide a number of
examples
regarding these two investment
rules, three
of which are reproduced below.
Example
1 – Separately negotiated benefit:
more
than an incidental benefit
An SMSF trustee invests in a
non-related company that owns a block of holiday apartments at a popular
tourist destination.
The members of the SMSF holiday
in this area every year and prior to making the investment owned a separate
holiday house nearby.
The trustee, when undertaking the
investment, negotiated for members of the SMSF to be able to stay at the
apartments for free. This is not a standard feature of the investment.
In return, the SMSF was required
to accept a reduction in dividends payable by the company. The members of the
SMSF sell their holiday house immediately after the SMSF makes the holiday
apartment investment.
The separate negotiation of the
benefit, which materially affects the return on the SMSF’s investment,
demonstrates that the benefit is purposeful and not incidental.
The facts reveal that the SMSF is
being maintained for a purpose of providing benefits other than those specified
by the superannuation law and, therefore, indicate a contravention of the sole purpose test.

Example
2 – Selling an asset for less than
market
value
Robert is a trustee and member of
an SMSF. The SMSF’s portfolio of assets includes a block of land located in an
inner city suburb where land values have risen significantly in recent years.
Robert sells the asset to his son
for $210,000. Two months prior to the sale, the block of land was independently
valued at $300,000.
The sale of the land by Robert to
his son for less than market value contravenes the prohibition on SMSFs providing financial assistance to a relative of
a member (Editor: And probably the
sole purpose test, as well).

Example
3 – Purchase of an asset by an SMSF for greater than market value
Andrew is a member and trustee of
an SMSF. Andrew needs to raise $100,000 for personal reasons.
He owns a block of land that
qualifies as business real property and has been independently appraised as
having a market value of $80,000.
As trustee of the SMSF, Andrew
agrees for the SMSF to purchase the land for $100,000.
The purchase of the land by
Andrew as trustee of the SMSF for greater than its market value is the giving
of financial assistance to himself (a member) and therefore contravenes the
superannuation law.
HALL JACKSON SERVICES
We would like
to remind our clients that we offer the following services through referral to
our valued contact
Financial
planning, investment and retirement advice;
Business
succession, estate planning and risk insurance; and
Residential
and commercial lending (including short-term financial), asset purchase and
refinancing.
Please contact
our office if you would like to discuss any of the above services. A full list
of services can be found on our website at www.halljackson.com.au
QUOTE FOR THE SEASON
“Spring is nature’s way of saying, “Lets
Party!”
- Robin Williams -